<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel>
<title>XING - Asia (RSS 2.0)</title>
<link>http://www.xing.com/net/asia/</link>
<description>Latest posts in XING group &#x22;Asia&#x22;</description>
<language>en-en</language>
<copyright>Copyright XING AG</copyright>
<pubDate>03 Oct 2013 04:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 04:20:05 -0000</lastBuildDate>
<managingEditor>en-support@xing.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>en-support@xing.com</webMaster>
<generator>epublica</generator>


<item>
<title>Top Scientists Slam and Ridicule UN IPCC Climate Report &#x2013; AsiaGlobal Renewable from Tara Naa (03 Oct 2013, 04:11 am) in group &#x22;Asia&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.xing.com/app/forum?op=showarticles&#x26;id=45205959&#x26;articleid=45205959#45205959</link>
<description>The New American - Moments after the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC) released a summary of its latest global-warming report on September 27, top climate scientists and experts were already reading through it and trashing the methods, findings, claims, and more. In fact, based on leaked drafts of the controversial report, critics had been debunking and ridiculing the UN&#x2019;s climate claims for weeks prior to the official release. Once the summary report was ...</description>
<author>Tara Naa &#x3C;en-support@xing.com&#x3E;</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.xing.com/app/forum?op=showarticles&#x26;id=45205959&#x26;articleid=45205959#45205959</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 04:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>