Mathematics / Mathematik / Matemática
Posts 1-6 of 6
-
Winfried Weber Group moderatorThe company name is only visible to registered members.question to the prime numbers
Haello,
a friend told me with the following problem:
"Völlig überraschend erfahre ich aus der Vorlesung v. Albrecht Beutelspacher bei B Alfa:
He saw a lesson in mathematics (on "BR Alfa", a German broadcast channel)
In dem Intervall [n+1,2n-1] liegt für n>1 immer eine Primzahl. In the intervall [n+1,2n-1] , n>1, there is always a prime number.
examples:
n=2 : {3} yes
n=3 : {4,5} yes, 5
n=4 : {5,6,7}, yes, 5 and 7
n=5: [6,7,8,9}, yes, 7
Kann man das im allgemeinen einfach einsehen? Wie?" Is this easy to see? How?
Wer hat eine Idee? Who has an idea?
Best regards,
Winfried
- 18 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
-
Aymeric Basille Premium MemberThe company name is only visible to registered members.Re: question to the prime numbers
Perhaps by integrating the density Function from Gauss or from Legendre between n+1 and 2n-1
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Prime...
Kind Regards
Aymeric BASILLE
- 18 Jun 2007, 5:35 pm
-
Post visible to registered members
-
Post visible to registered members
-
Post visible to registered members
-
Steve Dufourny Group moderatorThe company name is only visible to registered members.Re^5: question to the prime numbers
Hi all ,
The primes are so interestings in their distribution and series.
The reals, the irrationals , the rationals ,the complexs, the imaginaries.....in a physical logic must be inside a finite system, the different aleph of Cantor take all their sense in this realism and determinism.
If we take our quantum architecture, which are spheres entangled and specifics in rotation implying mass for me and in correlation with my theory of Spherisation, a GUT of Rotating Spheres.The number and the primes of this fractal of the ultim central coded sphere take a beautiful harmonious road of polarisation.The naturals, reals are the resulst of these distributions but the system needs limits for a thermodynamical point of vue and correlations.
Let's take the infinity, it is difficulot to encircle it due to our step of evolution at the universal scale.
But an important difference to make is this one, the finite universal system in evolution (and thus with its finite number) is different about the infinity than the unknonw behind our walls .This referential about the physicality thus is essential to encircle the spherization and the numbers.
Best Regards
Steve
- 17 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm
